James v. Staples

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

James v. Staples

180 A. 916, 87 N.H. 388, 1935 N.H. LEXIS 41

DecidedOctober 1, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 180 A. 916 (James v. Staples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Staples, 180 A. 916, 87 N.H. 388, 1935 N.H. LEXIS 41 (N.H. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order for a jury trial is to be interpreted by the trial justice making it in respect to its application to the trial had or to any retrial as well. Lear v. Brodeur, 84 N. H. 549, 550. If it was to apply to a retrial, it may be set aside upon a finding of accident, mistake or misfortune causing the continuance of the order to be unjust, conformably with the statutory principle (P. L., c. 342) relating to new trials.

Case discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order for a jury trial is to be interpreted by the trial justice making it in respect to its application to the trial had or to any retrial as well. Lear v. Brodeur, 84 N. H. 549, 550. If it was to apply to a retrial, it may be set aside upon a finding of accident, mistake or misfortune causing the continuance of the order to be unjust, conformably with the statutory principle (P. L., c. 342) relating to new trials.

Case discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 A. 916, 87 N.H. 388, 1935 N.H. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-staples-nh-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack