James v. Stansberry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6339
IVANDER JAMES, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Petersburg FCC Low,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00512-RLW)
Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 1, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ivander James, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ivander James, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. James v. Stansberry, Case No. 3:08-cv-
00512-RLW (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. Stansberry (James v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.