James v. Sidwell
This text of 54 N.E. 752 (James v. Sidwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The National Home, Building and Loan Association of Bloomington, Illinois, is an insolvent foreign corporation. On May 14, 1898, appellant was appointed receiver of the insolvent’s assets in Indiana.. On May 19, 1898, a receiver was appointed for the same association by the circuit court of the United States for the southern district of Illinois, and took possession of the assets in all the states in which the association did business, except in Indiana. Many Indiana citizens were either borrowing or non-borrowing members of the association. The assets in the hands of the Indiana receiver consist of the bonds and mortgages of resident members. Upon the intervening petition of appellees, the question was raised as to the proper method of settlement. The court ordered that borrowers be charged with the amounts loaned them, together with six per cent, interest, less all amounts paid by them for premium, interest and fines, reckoned by the rule for partial payments; and that all members, borrowers and non-borrowers alike, receive pro rata distribution upon the amounts paid on stock.
On the authority of Marion Trust Co. v. Trustees of Edwards Lodge, ante, 96; and Huter v. Union Trust Co., ante, 204, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 N.E. 752, 153 Ind. 697, 1899 Ind. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-sidwell-ind-1899.