James v. Sheriff

Louisiana Court of Appeal

James v. Sheriff

1 Gunby 98

DecidedJuly 1, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Gunby 98 (James v. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Sheriff, 1 Gunby 98 (La. Ct. App. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Reeves Lewis, J.,

ad hoc. Where no judgment for damages has been rendered against the surety on the injunction bond, he is a competent surety on the appeal bond of plaintiff. 36 An. 390.

2, Where a third person enjoins the sale of his property seized under fi.. fa. against another, he cannot recover counsel fees as damages, but may sue for all other damages occasioned by the seizure up to the time of instituting the suit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reeves Lewis, J.,

ad hoc. Where no judgment for damages has been rendered against the surety on the injunction bond, he is a competent surety on the appeal bond of plaintiff. 36 An. 390.

2, Where a third person enjoins the sale of his property seized under fi.. fa. against another, he cannot recover counsel fees as damages, but may sue for all other damages occasioned by the seizure up to the time of instituting the suit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Gunby 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-sheriff-lactapp-1885.