James v. Sam

335 S.W.2d 288, 1960 Tex. App. LEXIS 2192
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 20, 1960·No. 13626·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

POPE, Justice.

Plaintiff, George R. Sam, sued Floyd James in Justice Court for $90.45 damages to his vehicle as a result of a rear-end collision. James cross-acted for exactly one hundred dollars. Sam recovered judgment for $90.45, and recovered the same amount on appeal to the County Court. James was denied recovery on his cross-action. James has appealed from the judgment of the County Court.

Neither the amount in controversy nor the judgment exceeds $100 exclusive of interest and costs. Art. 1819, Vernon’s Ann. Tex.Stats. Since the amount in controversy is not in excess of $100, this Court does not have jurisdiction and the appeal is dismissed. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Douglas, Tex.Civ.App., 156 S.W.2d 576.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. Sam, 335 S.W.2d 288, 1960 Tex. App. LEXIS 2192 (Tex. Ct. App. 1960).

335 S.W.2d 288 (James v. Sam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shirley v. Texas Department of Public Safety
974 S.W.2d 321 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Levinson
981 S.W.2d 5 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)