James v. Rodriguez

193 A.D.2d 990, 598 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5132
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 20, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 193 A.D.2d 990 (James v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Rodriguez, 193 A.D.2d 990, 598 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered June 8, 1992 in Clinton County, which denied petitioner’s motion for reconsideration.

In moving for reconsideration, petitioner presented no new material facts but merely alluded to facts already in the record before Supreme Court. The motion was therefore clearly one for reargument. Because the denial of a motion to reargue is not appealable, the appeal must be dismissed (see, Vernooy v Vernooy, 138 AD2d 913; Nulman v Hall, 115 AD2d 837).

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pacella v. Whiteman Osterman & Hanna
14 A.D.3d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Ruiz v. Kuhlmann
268 A.D.2d 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Amsler v. Verrilli
203 A.D.2d 403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 A.D.2d 990, 598 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-rodriguez-nyappdiv-1993.