James v. Rochford
176 A.D. 882
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 176 A.D. 882 (James v. Rochford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
James v. Rochford, 176 A.D. 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
Order modified so as to direct that the receiver pay the net rents collected before the order of January 11, 1916, to Manheimer and the February rents to respondents, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
176 A.D. 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-rochford-nyappdiv-1916.