James v. Prosch
53 P. 1135, 19 Wash. 707, 1898 Wash. LEXIS 455
This text of 53 P. 1135 (James v. Prosch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
James v. Prosch, 53 P. 1135, 19 Wash. 707, 1898 Wash. LEXIS 455 (Wash. 1898).
Opinion
By reason of the rule announced in Swinburne v. Mills, 17 Wash. 611 (50 Pac. 489, 61 Am. St. Rep. 932), the judgment in this case will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Swinburne v. Mills
50 P. 489 (Washington Supreme Court, 1897)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
53 P. 1135, 19 Wash. 707, 1898 Wash. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-prosch-wash-1898.