James v. Prosch
53 P. 1135, 19 Wash. 707, 1898 Wash. LEXIS 455
Opinion
By reason of the rule announced in Swinburne v. Mills, 17 Wash. 611 (50 Pac. 489, 61 Am. St. Rep. 932), the judgment in this case will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. Prosch, 53 P. 1135, 19 Wash. 707, 1898 Wash. LEXIS 455 (Wash. 1898).
53 P. 1135 (James v. Prosch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Swinburne v. Mills
50 P. 489 (Washington Supreme Court, 1897)