James v. Poole

52 A.D.3d 1083, 858 N.Y.S.2d 920
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 19, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 52 A.D.3d 1083 (James v. Poole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Poole, 52 A.D.3d 1083, 858 N.Y.S.2d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with unauthorized exchange and drug possession after he was observed passing what proved to be marihuana to another inmate in a serving line. Petitioner was charged in a second misbehavior report with drug possession after a search of his cell recovered a substance which tested to be marihuana. A single tier III disciplinary hearing was held in connection with both reports, at the conclusion of which petitioner was [1084]*1084found guilty of all charges. That determination was administratively affirmed and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence including the two misbehavior reports and related hearing testimony (see Matter of Salahuddin v Goord, 49 AD3d 1107 [2008]). Petitioner’s denial of the allegations and claims of inconsistencies in the evidence created credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Jones v Goord, 50 AD3d 1427 [2008]). To the extent preserved, petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that there was a defective chain of custody, have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Peters, J.P, Rose, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Laws v. New York State Department of Correctional Services & Community Supervision
144 A.D.3d 1290 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Hodges v. Fischer
71 A.D.3d 1295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
James v. Fischer
58 A.D.3d 981 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.D.3d 1083, 858 N.Y.S.2d 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-poole-nyappdiv-2008.