James v. Piedmont Publishing Co.
This text of 157 S.E.2d 335 (James v. Piedmont Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court being evenly divided in opinion, three members of the Court being of opinion that the demurrer should be sustained and three members of the Court being of opinion that the demurrer should be overruled, Justice I. Beverly Lake taking no part in the consideration or decision of the case, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed after the manner of the usual practice of appellate courts in such cases and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Parrish v. Publishing Co., ante, 711, 157 S.E. 2d 334, and cases therein cited.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.E.2d 335, 271 N.C. 712, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-piedmont-publishing-co-nc-1967.