James v. Ozmint

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 5, 2007
Docket06-7528
StatusUnpublished

This text of James v. Ozmint (James v. Ozmint) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Ozmint, (4th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7528

ELWALDO R. JAMES, a/k/a Calvin B. Smith,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JON OZMINT, Director SC Department of Corrections; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of SC; WARDEN, LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:05-cv-01294-TLW)

Submitted: March 5, 2007 Decided: April 5, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elwaldo R. James, Appellant Pro Se. Roy F. Laney, Nikole Deanna Haltiwanger, Thomas Lowndes Pope, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Elwaldo R. James seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. James

challenges the calculation of his sentence, but he has been

released from custody and does not allege that collateral

consequences warrant relief. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal as moot. See Lane v.

Williams, 455 U.S. 624, 631 (1982); Vandenberg v. Rodgers, 801 F.2d

277, 278 (10th Cir. 1986). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James v. Ozmint, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-ozmint-ca4-2007.