James v. Office of Personnel Management

Fourth Circuit

James v. Office of Personnel Management

104 F. App'x 350

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 17, 2004·No. No. 04-1443·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Patricia I. James appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Office of Personnel Management on her action under the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See James v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., No. CA-03-3517-JFM (D.Md. Mar. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Patricia I. James appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Office of Personnel Management on her action under the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See James v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., No. CA-03-3517-JFM (D.Md. Mar. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

James v. Office of Personnel Management, 104 F. App'x 350 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

104 F. App'x 350 (James v. Office of Personnel Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.