James v. Office of Personnel Management
This text of 104 F. App'x 350 (James v. Office of Personnel Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Patricia I. James appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Office of Personnel Management on her action under the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See James v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., No. CA-03-3517-JFM (D.Md. Mar. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 F. App'x 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-office-of-personnel-management-ca4-2004.