James v. Oconee County

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 4, 2015
Docket2015-UP-057
StatusUnpublished

This text of James v. Oconee County (James v. Oconee County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Oconee County, (S.C. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Randolph M. James, P.C., a North Carolina Professional Corporation, Appellant,

v.

Oconee County, South Carolina, a political subdivision of the State of South Carolina, d/b/a Oconee County Regional Airport (KCEU), Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001295

Appeal From Oconee County R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-057 Heard January 6, 2015 – Filed February 4, 2015

AFFIRMED

Tracy Lynn Eggleston, of Cozen O'Connor, of Charlotte, NC, for Appellant.

Michael B.T. Wilkes and Charles Daniel Atkinson, both of Wilkes Law Firm, PA, of Spartanburg, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Randolph James appeals the trial court's dismissal of his tort action against Oconee County based on failure to make valid service on the County prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Rule 4(d)(6), SCRCP (stating process must be served on a county by delivery of summons and complaint to the chief executive officer or the clerk); Moore v. Simpson, 322 S.C. 518, 523-24, 473 S.E.2d 64, 67 (Ct. App. 1996) (stating without special authorization to receive process, service is not effective when made on an employee); South Carolina Code Ann. § 15-3-20(b) (2005) (stating a civil action is commenced when the summons and complaint are filed if actual service is completed by one hundred twenty days after filing).

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Simpson
473 S.E.2d 64 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James v. Oconee County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-oconee-county-scctapp-2015.