James v. N.C. Department of Correction
This text of James v. N.C. Department of Correction (James v. N.C. Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff has exceeded his time to file a written statement of the particular grounds for his appeal as required by Rule T303 by more than six months. As such, plaintiff's appeal to the Full Commission is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule T304. No costs are taxed to plaintiff, who was permitted to proceed in formapauperis.
This the 22nd day of March, 2011.
S/___________________ LINDA CHEATHAM COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/___________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER
S/___________________ STACI T. MEYER COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James v. N.C. Department of Correction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-nc-department-of-correction-ncworkcompcom-2011.