James v. Nash

Second Circuit

James v. Nash

98 F. App'x 908

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 7, 2004

DocketNo. 02-2732

StatusPublished

This text of 98 F. App'x 908 (James v. Nash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Nash, 98 F. App'x 908 (2d Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

[909]*909SUMMARY ORDER

Petitioner-Appellant Ethon C. James appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which he had brought pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 2241. After reviewing the record and considering all of Petitioner’s arguments, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. See Love v. Menifee, 333 F.3d 69, 73 (2d Cir.2003); Cephas v. Nash, 328 F.3d 98, 104 n. 5 (2d Cir.2003). We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[909]*909SUMMARY ORDER

Petitioner-Appellant Ethon C. James appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which he had brought pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 2241. After reviewing the record and considering all of Petitioner’s arguments, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. See Love v. Menifee, 333 F.3d 69, 73 (2d Cir.2003); Cephas v. Nash, 328 F.3d 98, 104 n. 5 (2d Cir.2003). We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 F. App'x 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-nash-ca2-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack