James v. Nash

Second Circuit

James v. Nash

98 F. App'x 908

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 7, 2004·No. No. 02-2732·Published

Opinion

[909] SUMMARY ORDER

Petitioner-Appellant Ethon C. James appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which he had brought pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 2241. After reviewing the record and considering all of Petitioner’s arguments, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. See Love v. Menifee, 333 F.3d 69, 73 (2d Cir.2003); Cephas v. Nash, 328 F.3d 98, 104 n. 5 (2d Cir.2003). We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[909] SUMMARY ORDER

Petitioner-Appellant Ethon C. James appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which he had brought pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 2241. After reviewing the record and considering all of Petitioner’s arguments, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. See Love v. Menifee, 333 F.3d 69, 73 (2d Cir.2003); Cephas v. Nash, 328 F.3d 98, 104 n. 5 (2d Cir.2003). We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

James v. Nash, 98 F. App'x 908 (2d Cir. 2004).

Pincite

98 F. App'x 908 (James v. Nash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related