James v. Murray

865 F.2d 1271, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 452, 1989 WL 1731
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 9, 1989
Docket87-6482
StatusPublished

This text of 865 F.2d 1271 (James v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Murray, 865 F.2d 1271, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 452, 1989 WL 1731 (9th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

865 F.2d 1271

James (Eunice M.)
v.
Murray (Cecile May), Washburn (ThomaS B., Rose E.),
Brizendine (Richard C.), Davis (Elsie), Smyth
(Andrew E.), Group Prime Inv., Inc.,
Johnson (Arnold M.)

NO. 87-6482

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

JAN 09, 1989

Appeal From: C.D.Cal.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
865 F.2d 1271, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 452, 1989 WL 1731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-murray-ca9-1989.