James v. MSPB
This text of James v. MSPB (James v. MSPB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 24-1908 Document: 22 Page: 1 Filed: 05/02/2025
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MARCUS AURELIUS JAMES, Petitioner
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent ______________________
2024-1908 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT-3443-21-0251-I-1. ______________________
ORDER Marcus James filed an opening brief in the above- captioned appeal. The Clerk of Court found the briefs to be non-compliant. Pursuant to the March 13, 2025 notice of non-compliance, failure to timely file a corrected version may result in the document being stricken. The petitioner having failed to file the corrected opening brief within the time permitted by the March 13, 2025 notice of non-compliance, Case: 24-1908 Document: 22 Page: 2 Filed: 05/02/2025
2 JAMES V. MSPB
IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The opening brief and corrected opening brief are stricken. (2) The petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules. See Fed. Cir. R. 25(c)(4); Fed. Cir. R. 31(d).
FOR THE COURT
May 2, 2025 Date
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James v. MSPB, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-mspb-cafc-2025.