James v. MOMAH

217 P.3d 1158, 166 Wash. 2d 1025
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 9, 2009
Docket82998-5
StatusPublished

This text of 217 P.3d 1158 (James v. MOMAH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. MOMAH, 217 P.3d 1158, 166 Wash. 2d 1025 (Wash. 2009).

Opinion

217 P.3d 1158 (2009)
166 Wash.2d 1025

Nancy JAMES as trustee for The Estate of Cherie Rule, Kathryn Ellis as trustee for The Estate of Rena Burns and Lisa McDougal, Respondents,
v.
Charles MOMAH, also d/b/a Northwest Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology & Infertility, Petitioner.

No. 82998-5.

Supreme Court of Washington.

September 9, 2009.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens and J. Johnson, considered at its September 8, 2009, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioner's motion to waive the tiling fee for a petition for review is granted. The petition for review is granted and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals to reinstate the notice of appeal.

For the Court

/s/ Gerry L. Alexander CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 P.3d 1158, 166 Wash. 2d 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-momah-wash-2009.