James v. Mobile Travelodge

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

James v. Mobile Travelodge

417 So. 2d 205, 1982 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1221

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJune 9, 1982

DocketCiv. 3073

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 417 So. 2d 205 (James v. Mobile Travelodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Mobile Travelodge, 417 So. 2d 205, 1982 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1221 (Ala. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, Retired Circuit Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.

After a nonjury trial, the circuit court rendered a judgment that, while the plaintiff suffered no permanent partial disability, she was temporarily totally disabled from March 3, 1979, the date of the injury, through July 2, 1979. That court determined that compensation for the plaintiff’s [206]*206temporary total disability had been fully paid.

The plaintiff appealed and argues error as to the findings that there was no permanent partial disability or, in the alternative, she states that the duration of the temporary disability so awarded was too short.

Both parties state in their briefs that the plaintiff testified at the trial and the final judgment recites such fact therein. However, no court reporter’s transcript of the trial evidence appears in the record before us. The clerk’s portion of the record apparently includes the exhibits introduced at trial.

Thus, there was testimony before the trial court, consisting of the trial evidence, which is not before this court. That missing evidence could have had a definite influence upon the trial court in arriving at its specific findings. Therefore, we are not authorized to disturb either of the factual findings now argued as being erroneous but we must presume that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the judgment as to both of those disputed issues. Valley Mining Corporation, Inc. v. Metro Bank, 383 So.2d 158 (Ala.1980); 2A Ala.Digest Appeal & Error key 907(4). We are required to affirm this case.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Circuit Judge EDWARD N. SCRUGGS while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of section 12-18-10(e) of the Code of Alabama of 1975 and this opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, Retired Circuit Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.

After a nonjury trial, the circuit court rendered a judgment that, while the plaintiff suffered no permanent partial disability, she was temporarily totally disabled from March 3, 1979, the date of the injury, through July 2, 1979. That court determined that compensation for the plaintiff’s [206]*206temporary total disability had been fully paid.

The plaintiff appealed and argues error as to the findings that there was no permanent partial disability or, in the alternative, she states that the duration of the temporary disability so awarded was too short.

Both parties state in their briefs that the plaintiff testified at the trial and the final judgment recites such fact therein. However, no court reporter’s transcript of the trial evidence appears in the record before us. The clerk’s portion of the record apparently includes the exhibits introduced at trial.

Thus, there was testimony before the trial court, consisting of the trial evidence, which is not before this court. That missing evidence could have had a definite influence upon the trial court in arriving at its specific findings. Therefore, we are not authorized to disturb either of the factual findings now argued as being erroneous but we must presume that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the judgment as to both of those disputed issues. Valley Mining Corporation, Inc. v. Metro Bank, 383 So.2d 158 (Ala.1980); 2A Ala.Digest Appeal & Error key 907(4). We are required to affirm this case.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Circuit Judge EDWARD N. SCRUGGS while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of section 12-18-10(e) of the Code of Alabama of 1975 and this opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

417 So. 2d 205, 1982 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-mobile-travelodge-alacivapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack