James v. Milne

Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas

James v. Milne

3 Pennyp. 394

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

DecidedJanuary 17, 1883

DocketNos. 140, 141; No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Pennyp. 394 (James v. Milne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Milne, 3 Pennyp. 394 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

— Per Curiam :

These two cases present the same question. They were argued together. We think the principle decided in Milne’s Appeal, 11 W. N., 330, rules the cases against the plaintiff in error. While that case was in the Orphans’ Court, yet the reason on which it rests applies with equal force to the present cases. Judgment was, therefore, correctly entered in favor of the defendant in error in each case on the reserved question.

Judgment in each case affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Per Curiam :

These two cases present the same question. They were argued together. We think the principle decided in Milne’s Appeal, 11 W. N., 330, rules the cases against the plaintiff in error. While that case was in the Orphans’ Court, yet the reason on which it rests applies with equal force to the present cases. Judgment was, therefore, correctly entered in favor of the defendant in error in each case on the reserved question.

Judgment in each case affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Pennyp. 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-milne-pactcomplphilad-1883.