James v. Miller v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary

Ninth Circuit

James v. Miller v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary

421 F.2d 1360, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10332

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 12, 1970·No. 23172_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order appealed from is vacated.

It is our view that the state should be required to respond and to submit to the *1361 district court the state trial transcript brought here.

We do not reach at this time the bypass issue or the question of whether the trial transcript adequately answers the contentions of appellant’s petition.

Remanded for proceedings consistent with the foregoing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The order appealed from is vacated.

It is our view that the state should be required to respond and to submit to the *1361 district court the state trial transcript brought here.

We do not reach at this time the bypass issue or the question of whether the trial transcript adequately answers the contentions of appellant’s petition.

Remanded for proceedings consistent with the foregoing.

James v. Miller v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, 421 F.2d 1360, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10332 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

421 F.2d 1360 (James v. Miller v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.