James v. Meow Media, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided August 13, 2002·No. 00-5922·Published

Opinion

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS

81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

s2( s$0(6HWDO ; 3ODLQWLIIV$SSHOODQWV    1R Y  !  0(2: 0(',$ ,1&HWDO  'HIHQGDQWV$SSHOOHHV  1 $SSHDOIURPWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW IRUWKH:HVWHUQ'LVWULFWRI.HQWXFN\DW3DGXFDK 1Rn(GZDUG+sRKQVWRQH 6HQLRU'LVWULFWsXGJH $UJXHG1RYHPEHU 'HFLGHGDQG)LOHG$XJXVW %HIRUH*8<DQG%2**6&LUFXLWsXGJHVDQG&$55 'LVWULFWsXGJH

7KH +RQRUDEOH sDPHV * &DUU 8QLWHG 6WDWHV 'LVWULFW sXGJH IRU WKH 1RUWKHUQ 'LVWULFW RI 2KLR VLWWLQJ E\ GHVLJQDWLRQ

  sDPHVHWDOY0HRZ0HGLDHWDO 1R 1R sDPHVHWDOY0HRZ0HGLDHWDO 

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB SXUSRVHVRI.HQWXFN\ODZLVZKHWKHULWLVmWDQJLEOHlDQGWKDW WKHFDUWULGJHVDQGFDVVHWWHVDUHmWDQJLEOHl$VIRUWKHLQWHUQHW &2816(/ VLWHVsDPHVSRLQWVXVWRDFRXUWWKDWKDVKHOGWKDWmHOHFWULFLW\l LVDmSURGXFWlIRUSXUSRVHVRIVWULFWOLDELOLW\XQGHU.HQWXFN\ $5*8('  0LFKDHO $ %UHHQ 0,.( %5((1 ODZ6HH&*%U\DQWY7UL&RXQW\(OHF0HPEHUVKLS&RUS $77251(<6 $7 /$: %RZOLQJ *UHHQ .HQWXFN\ IRU )6XSS :'.\ ,QWHUQHWVLWHVDUH $SSHOODQWV  3DXO 0 6PLWK s(11(5  %/2&. QRWKLQJ PRUH WKDQ FRPPXQLFDWLYH HOHFWULFDO SXOVHV sDPHV :DVKLQJWRQ '& .HYLQ 7 %DLQH :,//,$06 FRQWHQGVsDPHVDUJXHVWKDWWKHUHLVQRUHOHYDQWGLIIHUHQFH &2112//< :DVKLQJWRQ '& IRU $SSHOOHHV EHWZHHQWKHLQWHUQHWWUDQVPLVVLRQVDQGWKHHOHFWULFLW\ 21%5,()  0LFKDHO $ %UHHQ .HUU\ 6 0RUJDQ 0,.( %5((1$77251(<6$7/$:%RZOLQJ*UHHQ.HQWXFN\ $QG RI FRXUVH sDPHV LV SDUWLDOO\ FRUUHFW  &HUWDLQO\ LI D IRU$SSHOODQWV3DXO06PLWK'HDQQH(0D\QDUG'DYLG& YLGHRFDVVHWWHH[SORGHGDQGLQMXUHGLWVXVHUZHZRXOGKROG %HOW (OL]DEHWK $ &DYDQDJK s(11(5  %/2&. LWDmSURGXFWlDQGLWVSURGXFHUVWULFWO\OLDEOHIRUWKHXVHUjV :DVKLQJWRQ '& .HYLQ 7 %DLQH :,//,$06 SK\VLFDOGDPDJHV,QWKLVFDVHKRZHYHUsDPHVLVDUJXLQJ &2112//<:DVKLQJWRQ'&0DUN3%U\DQW%5<$17 WKDWWKHZRUGVDQGLPDJHVSXUYH\HGRQWKHWDQJLEOHFDVVHWWHV  .$87= 3DGXFDK .HQWXFN\ 6WHYHQ & sDFNVRQ FDUWULGJHVDQGSHUKDSVHYHQWKHHOHFWULFDOSXOVHVWKURXJKWKH s$&.621  s$**(56 3DGXFDK .HQWXFN\ sRHO 1 LQWHUQHWFDXVHG&DUQHDOWRVQDSDQGWRHIIHFWWKHGHDWKVRIWKH .UHL]PDQ(9$1626%251( .5(,=0$12FHDQ1HZ YLFWLPV:KHQGHDOLQJZLWKLGHDVDQGLPDJHVFRXUWVKDYH sHUVH\ *HUDOG 2 6ZHHQH\ sU sRKQ 7 :LOOLDPV /25' EHHQ ZLOOLQJ WR VHSDUDWH WKH VHQVH LQ ZKLFK WKH WDQJLEOH %,66(// %522.&KLFDJR,OOLQRLV(OL]DEHWK80HQGHO FRQWDLQHUV RI WKRVH LGHDV DUH SURGXFWV IURP WKHLU 5LFKDUG+&&OD\3DWULFN6KDQH2j%U\DQ:22':$5' FRPPXQLFDWLYHHOHPHQWIRUSXUSRVHVRIVWULFWOLDELOLW\6HH +2%621  )8/721 /RXLVYLOOH .HQWXFN\ sRKQ 'DYLG HJ:LQWHUY*33XWQDPjV6RQV)G WK &ROH 6U 0DWWKHZ 3 &RRN &2/( 0225(  %$.(5 &LU sRQHVYs%/LSSLQFRWW&R)6XSS %RZOLQJ *UHHQ .HQWXFN\ 3DXO ( 6DODPDQFD /H[LQJWRQ  ' 0G    :H ILQG WKHVH GHFLVLRQV ZHOO .HQWXFN\ ' :DGH &ORXG sU sDPHV 7 'UDNHOH\ UHDVRQHG  7KH YLGHR JDPH FDUWULGJHV PRYLH FDVVHWWH DQG +,(56&+( 0$57(16 +$<:$5' '5$.(/(< LQWHUQHW WUDQVPLVVLRQV DUH QRW VXIILFLHQWO\ mWDQJLEOHl WR 85%$&+ $GGLVRQ 7H[DV 6WHSKHQ ( 6PLWK sU FRQVWLWXWH SURGXFWV LQ WKH VHQVH RI WKHLU FRPPXQLFDWLYH 0F0855<  /,9,1*6721 3DGXFDK .HQWXFN\ 9 FRQWHQW 7KRPDV )U\PDQ sU *5((1(%$80 '2// 0F'21$/' /H[LQJWRQ .HQWXFN\ 0DUN 6 5LGGOH 9 *5((1(%$80 '2//  0F'21$/' /RXLVYLOOH .HQWXFN\%DUU\52VWUDJHU0DU\(0F*DUU\6,03621 )RU DOO WKH IRUHJRLQJ UHDVRQV ZH $)),50 WKH GLVWULFW 7+$&+(5 %$57/(771HZ

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. Meow Media, Inc, (6th Cir. 2002).

James v. Meow Media, Inc (James v. Meow Media, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.