James v. Maynard

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 2011
Docket11-6369
StatusUnpublished

This text of James v. Maynard (James v. Maynard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Maynard, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6369

COREY LAMONDE JAMES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GARY D. MAYNARD; GENE M. JOHNSON,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-02885-AW)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey Lamonde James, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Corey Lamonde James appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. James v. Maynard, No. 8:09-cv-02885-AW (D. Md. filed

Feb. 22, 2011; entered Feb. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James v. Maynard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-maynard-ca4-2011.