James v. Loyd

Louisiana Court of Appeal

James v. Loyd

617 So. 2d 604, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 1429, 1993 WL 105638

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided April 7, 1993·No. No. 92-598·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

YELVERTON, Judge.

For the reasons given in Cagle v. Succession of Loyd, 617 So.2d 592 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), handed down this date, the judgment in favor of McCauley M. James and Elise Pierson James and against defendant, the Succession of Jess Loyd, Jr., in the amount of $4,035,632, with legal interest from date of judicial demand until paid, and costs below and on appeal, is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

YELVERTON, Judge.

For the reasons given in Cagle v. Succession of Loyd, 617 So.2d 592 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), handed down this date, the judgment in favor of McCauley M. James and Elise Pierson James and against defendant, the Succession of Jess Loyd, Jr., in the amount of $4,035,632, with legal interest from date of judicial demand until paid, and costs below and on appeal, is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

James v. Loyd, 617 So. 2d 604, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 1429, 1993 WL 105638 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

617 So. 2d 604 (James v. Loyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related