James v. Long v. Southwest Funding, L.P. OneWest Bank, FSB IndyMac Mortgage Services And Deutsche Bank National Trust, Co.
This text of James v. Long v. Southwest Funding, L.P. OneWest Bank, FSB IndyMac Mortgage Services And Deutsche Bank National Trust, Co. (James v. Long v. Southwest Funding, L.P. OneWest Bank, FSB IndyMac Mortgage Services And Deutsche Bank National Trust, Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 03-15-00020-CV 4959347 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/20/2015 4:28:55 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK CAUSE NO. 03-15-00020-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 3rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/20/2015 4:28:55 PM ___________________________ JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk JAMES V. LONG, ONEWEST BANK, FSB. et al Appellee ___________________________
On Appeal from the 126th Judicial District Court Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GN-1 0-003483 ___________________________
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF
1. This case is on appeal from the 126th Judicial District Court of Travis
County, Texas in trial court cause number Trial Court Cause No. 2013-00767
2. The transcript was filed on February 18, 2015. Appellants brief was due
March 20, 2015.
3. Appellant requests an extension of time of on month from the due date,
i.e. until Monday, April 20, 2015.
4. No prior extension to file the brief has been received in this cause.
5. The need for the extension is as follows. Appellant’s counsel is a solo
practitioner. He had already prepared a draft response to the issues on appeal, but
needed to incorporate the record and additional case sites, and to put it in the form
required by the court. Counsel had regular clients experience unexpected complex criminal matters which required Counsel to act immediately to protect their
interests. Counsel also had to prepare three complex motions and responses to
summary judgment. This in addition to counsel’s normal case load prevented him
from completing a full brief. Appellant moves for an extension to April 20, 2015.
WHEREFORE, Appellant prays that the court grant it an extension of time
to file its brief and for such other and further relief as is just.
Respectfully submitted,
____/S/James D. Pierce_______________ JAMES D. PIERCE State Bar No. 15994500 Comerica Bank Building One Sugar Creek Center Blvd., Suite 1080 Sugar Land, Texas 77478-3560 (713) 650-0150 office (713) 650-0146 facsimile jim@jamespierce.com email ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
The motion is unopposed. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
In compliance with Texas Rules of Appellant Civil Procedure, on April 1, 2015, this pleading was served upon all parties and counsel of record electronically.
_____/S/James D. Pierce_________________ JAMES D. PIERCE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James v. Long v. Southwest Funding, L.P. OneWest Bank, FSB IndyMac Mortgage Services And Deutsche Bank National Trust, Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-long-v-southwest-funding-lp-onewest-bank-fsb-indymac-mortgage-texapp-2015.