James v. Lemonade Insurance Agency, LLC

Opinion

* * *

TRONDERRICA JAMES, Case No. 2:22-cv-01558-RFB-VCF

Plaintiff(s), ORDER v.

LLC., et al., Defendant(s). Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] of the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered January 10, 2023. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by January 24, 2023. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. . . . 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] 1s ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED and Judgment entered. DATED: April 20, 2023. A < RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II United States District Judge

-2-