James v. Laursen

Supreme Court of Florida

James v. Laursen

98 So. 2d 84

DecidedNovember 6, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 98 So. 2d 84 (James v. Laursen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Laursen, 98 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

From an examination of the record we conclude that the chancellor is not shown clearly to have erred when he held on conflicting evidence that the instrument executed by the appellees was a mortgage.

We decide, however, that the total amount indicated by evidence to have been recoverable does not coincide with the amount fixed in the decree. So, in this respect the decree is reversed with directions to amend it setting out what items were rejected and what accepted and how the total amount required to redeem was determined.

TERRELL, C. J., and TPIOMAS, HOB-SON, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

From an examination of the record we conclude that the chancellor is not shown clearly to have erred when he held on conflicting evidence that the instrument executed by the appellees was a mortgage.

We decide, however, that the total amount indicated by evidence to have been recoverable does not coincide with the amount fixed in the decree. So, in this respect the decree is reversed with directions to amend it setting out what items were rejected and what accepted and how the total amount required to redeem was determined.

TERRELL, C. J., and TPIOMAS, HOB-SON, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 So. 2d 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-laursen-fla-1957.