James v. James

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

James v. James

88 A. 772, 242 Pa. 42, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 835

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 27, 1913

DocketAppeal, No. 121

StatusPublished

This text of 88 A. 772 (James v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. James, 88 A. 772, 242 Pa. 42, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 835 (Pa. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

While the contract of January 30, 1911, is joint in form, it is, as the court below correctly held, several in effect, supporting the action brought by W. A. James, the appellee. With appellants’ first assignment of error out of the way, it remains only to say that, in the court’s submission of the case to the jury, no error is discoverable, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

While the contract of January 30, 1911, is joint in form, it is, as the court below correctly held, several in effect, supporting the action brought by W. A. James, the appellee. With appellants’ first assignment of error out of the way, it remains only to say that, in the court’s submission of the case to the jury, no error is discoverable, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A. 772, 242 Pa. 42, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-james-pa-1913.