James v. James

542 So. 2d 486, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1148, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2561, 1989 WL 47156
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 1989·No. No. 88-2566·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LETTS, Judge.

The petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari which would preclude the necessity of providing additional discovery in a dissolution proceeding involving a dispute over alimony, child support and custody. We grant the petition and reinstate the trial judge’s original order of August 8, 1988, which denied the motion to file the additional interrogatories.

We are of the opinion that the interrogatories in question constitute an “unfettered fishing expedition ... [which] will simply encourage the return of the fault concept to dissolution proceedings with all of its attendant atrocities.” Smith v. Bloom, 506 So.2d 1173, 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). See also Slatnick v. Leadership Housing Systems of Florida, 368 So.2d 78 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

CERTIORARI GRANTED.

STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. James, 542 So. 2d 486, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1148, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2561, 1989 WL 47156 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

542 So. 2d 486 (James v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nudelman v. Nudelman
542 So. 2d 486 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)