James v. James

542 So. 2d 486, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1148, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2561, 1989 WL 47156
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 10, 1989
DocketNo. 88-2566
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 542 So. 2d 486 (James v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. James, 542 So. 2d 486, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1148, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2561, 1989 WL 47156 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

LETTS, Judge.

The petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari which would preclude the necessity of providing additional discovery in a dissolution proceeding involving a dispute over alimony, child support and custody. We grant the petition and reinstate the trial judge’s original order of August 8, 1988, which denied the motion to file the additional interrogatories.

We are of the opinion that the interrogatories in question constitute an “unfettered fishing expedition ... [which] will simply encourage the return of the fault concept to dissolution proceedings with all of its attendant atrocities.” Smith v. Bloom, 506 So.2d 1173, 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). See also Slatnick v. Leadership Housing Systems of Florida, 368 So.2d 78 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

CERTIORARI GRANTED.

STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nudelman v. Nudelman
542 So. 2d 486 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
542 So. 2d 486, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1148, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2561, 1989 WL 47156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-james-fladistctapp-1989.