James v. James

537 So. 2d 637, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 158, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5665, 1988 WL 138555
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 29, 1988
DocketNo. 88-1248
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 537 So. 2d 637 (James v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. James, 537 So. 2d 637, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 158, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5665, 1988 WL 138555 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution. We affirm the trial court's award of child support. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). However, we strike that portion of the final judgment which reserves jurisdiction to award the wife lump sum alimony because it is based on a remote future occurrence. See Kernan v. Kernan, 495 So.2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

AFFIRMED as modified.

SHARP, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Johnson
537 So. 2d 637 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
537 So. 2d 637, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 158, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5665, 1988 WL 138555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-james-fladistctapp-1988.