James v. James
537 So. 2d 637, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 158, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5665, 1988 WL 138555
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 1988·No. No. 88-1248·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution. We affirm the trial court's award of child support. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). However, we strike that portion of the final judgment which reserves jurisdiction to award the wife lump sum alimony because it is based on a remote future occurrence. See Kernan v. Kernan, 495 So.2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
AFFIRMED as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. James, 537 So. 2d 637, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 158, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5665, 1988 WL 138555 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
537 So. 2d 637 (James v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. Johnson
537 So. 2d 637 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)