James v. James

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

James v. James

764 So. 2d 561, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 134, 2000 WL 218300

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 764 So. 2d 549 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided February 25, 2000·No. 2970720·Published

Opinion

On Remand from the Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte James, 764 So.2d [562]*562557 (Ala.1999). On remand to this court and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as to its award of a $100,000 attorney fee to the wife’s attorney.

AFFIRMED.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Remand from the Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte James, 764 So.2d [562]*562557 (Ala.1999). On remand to this court and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as to its award of a $100,000 attorney fee to the wife’s attorney.

AFFIRMED.

All the judges concur.

James v. James, 764 So. 2d 561, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 134, 2000 WL 218300 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

764 So. 2d 561 (James v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related