James v. Interstate Consolidated Street Railway Co.
This text of 79 N.E. 264 (James v. Interstate Consolidated Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As frequently happens in cases of this kind, the evidence as to many of the material points was very conflicting. We have carefully examined it, and are of opinion that the questions whether the plaintiff in the management of his team and in his efforts to ascertain whether a car was approaching used due care, and whether the defendant in the management and equipment of its car was negligent, were questions of fact and not of law. The case was properly submitted to the jury.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 N.E. 264, 193 Mass. 264, 1906 Mass. LEXIS 1193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-interstate-consolidated-street-railway-co-mass-1906.