James v. Hughill

Illinois Supreme Court

James v. Hughill

3 Ill. 361

DecidedDecember 15, 1840

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ill. 361 (James v. Hughill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Hughill, 3 Ill. 361 (Ill. 1840).

Pincite

Opinion

In this cause (judgment having been rendered by default in the Court below) a writ of certiorari was granted to the Court below, on the ground, that, subsequent to the taking of the appeal herein, the Court below bad permitted the sheriff, who served the process upon the defendants below, to amend his return, by adding his signature thereto, which he had before omitted ; and such amendment had been made since the record had been transmitted to this Court.

S. T. Logan, for the appellants. E. D. Baker, for the appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this cause (judgment having been rendered by default in the Court below) a writ of certiorari was granted to the Court below, on the ground, that, subsequent to the taking of the appeal herein, the Court below bad permitted the sheriff, who served the process upon the defendants below, to amend his return, by adding his signature thereto, which he had before omitted ; and such amendment had been made since the record had been transmitted to this Court.

S. T. Logan, for the appellants. E. D. Baker, for the appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Ill. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-hughill-ill-1840.