James v. Henry

16 Johns. 233
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1819
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 16 Johns. 233 (James v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Henry, 16 Johns. 233 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).

Opinion

THE COURT said, that a

Justice’s judgment was equivalent, at least, to a specialty; and that assumpsit will not, therefore, lie on such a judgment; but the action should be 7 t (ICOte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hard v. Shipman
6 Barb. 621 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)
Mitchell v. Hawley
4 Denio 414 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Johns. 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-henry-nysupct-1819.