James v. Henry
16 Johns. 233
Opinion
Justice’s judgment was equivalent, at least, to a specialty; and that assumpsit will not, therefore, lie on such a judgment; but the action should be 7 t (ICOte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. Henry, 16 Johns. 233 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).
16 Johns. 233 (James v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hard v. Shipman
6 Barb. 621 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)
Mitchell v. Hawley
4 Denio 414 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)