James v. Greenway, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

James v. Greenway, Inc.

193 S.E.2d 372, 17 N.C. App. 156, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1604

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedDecember 20, 1972

DocketNo. 725SC726

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 S.E.2d 372 (James v. Greenway, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Greenway, Inc., 193 S.E.2d 372, 17 N.C. App. 156, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1604 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The order appealed from was dated and filed 17 May 1972. The Rules of Practice in this Court require the record on appeal to be docketed within ninety (90) days after the date of the judgment, order, decree or determination appealed from unless the trial tribunal, for good cause, extends the time not exceeding sixty (60) days. Rule 5. In the instant case no extension of time was procured from the trial tribunal, and the ninety (90) days expired 15 August 1972. The record on appeal was not filed in this Court until 21 August 1972 and was therefore not timely filed. Dixon v. Dixon, 6 N.C. App. 623, 170 S.E. 2d 561 (1969); Kurtz v. Insurance Co., 6 N.C. App. 625, 170 S.E. 2d 496 (1969).

For failure to comply with the rules of this Court

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Morris and Parker concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The order appealed from was dated and filed 17 May 1972. The Rules of Practice in this Court require the record on appeal to be docketed within ninety (90) days after the date of the judgment, order, decree or determination appealed from unless the trial tribunal, for good cause, extends the time not exceeding sixty (60) days. Rule 5. In the instant case no extension of time was procured from the trial tribunal, and the ninety (90) days expired 15 August 1972. The record on appeal was not filed in this Court until 21 August 1972 and was therefore not timely filed. Dixon v. Dixon, 6 N.C. App. 623, 170 S.E. 2d 561 (1969); Kurtz v. Insurance Co., 6 N.C. App. 625, 170 S.E. 2d 496 (1969).

For failure to comply with the rules of this Court

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Morris and Parker concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 S.E.2d 372, 17 N.C. App. 156, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-greenway-inc-ncctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack