Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/James v. Florida Department of Corrections

James v. Florida Department of Corrections

65 So. 3d 119, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10301, 2011 WL 2578568
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 30, 2011
DocketNo. 1D10-5607
StatusPublished

This text of 65 So. 3d 119 (James v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Florida Department of Corrections, 65 So. 3d 119, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10301, 2011 WL 2578568 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is DENIED on the merits. See Dickinson v. Fla. Natl. Org. for Women, 763 So.2d 1245, 1247 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (stating that in “the case of state agencies, the county of ‘residence’ is where the agency’s headquarters are located”); Pettway v. State, 776 So.2d 930 (Fla.2000) (holding that when a party has been banned from appearing pro se in a particular tribunal, he or she cannot go to another tribunal to avoid the consequences of the sanction).

BENTON, C.J., LEWIS and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pettway v. State
776 So. 2d 930 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Dickinson v. FL NAT. ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, INC.
763 So. 2d 1245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 So. 3d 119, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10301, 2011 WL 2578568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2011.