James v. Fink

173 Misc. 730, 19 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1613
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 28, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 Misc. 730 (James v. Fink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Fink, 173 Misc. 730, 19 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant received from the plaintiff moneys to pay off the sewer assessment in full. At the time of the closing the assessment had been reduced by thirty per cent, of which fact plaintiff had no knowledge. While there had been an adjustment as of a date prior to the date of closing, still plaintiff was entitled to receive the benefit of the reduction in the assessment. (Lounsbury v. Potter, 37 N. Y. Super. Ct. 57; Pirsson v. Arkenburg, 29 N. Y. St. Repr. 529.)

So much of judgment and order as grants defendant Eden Homes, Inc., summary judgment reversed, and motion denied as to said defendant; judgment and order affirmed as to other defendants.

So much of order as denies plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against Eden Homes, Inc., reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted as to said defendant; order affirmed as to other defendants.

All concur. Present — McCook, Hammer and Miller, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lentino v. Maltese
34 Misc. 2d 650 (New York District Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 Misc. 730, 19 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-fink-nyappterm-1940.