James v. Farmers Ins. Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

James v. Farmers Ins. Co.

567 S.W.3d 664

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 13, 2018

DocketED 106505

StatusPublished

This text of 567 S.W.3d 664 (James v. Farmers Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Farmers Ins. Co., 567 S.W.3d 664 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jennifer James (Appellant) appeals the trial court's judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Farmers Insurance Co., Inc. (Farmers). Appellant's sole point on appeal claims the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Farmers because Appellant was entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under Farmers' motor vehicle liability insurance policy. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jennifer James (Appellant) appeals the trial court's judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Farmers Insurance Co., Inc. (Farmers). Appellant's sole point on appeal claims the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Farmers because Appellant was entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under Farmers' motor vehicle liability insurance policy. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 S.W.3d 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-farmers-ins-co-moctapp-2018.