James v. E. O. Roberts Co.
This text of 235 A.D. 795 (James v. E. O. Roberts Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order dismissing complaint for insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint, on payment of ten dollars costs, if he be advised that the blocking of the sidewalk by the defendant was unlawful within the rule enunciated in O’ Neill v. City of Port Jervis (253 N. Y. 423). No opinion. Kapper, [796]*796Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents upon the ground that in his opinion the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-e-o-roberts-co-nyappdiv-1932.