James v. Duluth Clinic

921 N.W.2d 555
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 8, 2019·No. A18-1498·Published

Opinion

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 21, 2018, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

*556Employee is awarded $3,500 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ ______________________________

G. Barry Anderson

Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. Duluth Clinic, 921 N.W.2d 555 (Mich. 2019).

921 N.W.2d 555 (James v. Duluth Clinic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)