Home/Supreme Court of Minnesota/James v. Duluth Clinic

James v. Duluth Clinic

921 N.W.2d 555
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 8, 2019
DocketA18-1498
StatusPublished

This text of 921 N.W.2d 555 (James v. Duluth Clinic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Duluth Clinic, 921 N.W.2d 555 (Mich. 2019).

Opinion

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 21, 2018, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

*556Employee is awarded $3,500 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ ______________________________

G. Barry Anderson

Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
921 N.W.2d 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-duluth-clinic-minn-2019.