James v. Drivetime of Fresno

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 VANESSA JAMES, Case No. 1: 20-cv-00207-NONE-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE AND 11 v. CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 12 | DRIVETIME OF FRESNO, PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 13 Defendant. (ECF No. 29) 14 15 On October 27, 2021, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice. (ECF 16 | No. 29.) The stipulation does not address any award for costs or attorneys’ fees. In light of the 17 | stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson 18 | v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice 19 | and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to assign a district judge to 21 | this case for the purpose of closing the case and then to adjust the docket to reflect voluntary 22 | dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 FA. | Dated: _ October 27, 2021 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28