James v. District of Columbia

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. District of Columbia. Read the opinion of the Court — 869 F. Supp. 2d 119
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 13, 2013·No. Civil Action No. 2012-0376·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

THERESA JAMES, ) Parent and Next Friend ofE.J., a minor ) ) E.J., ) individually ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 12-376 (RJL) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) Defendant. )

fmm:ER (June CJ, 2013) (Dkts. ##10, 12) For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this ;fd.;of ,

June 2013, it is hereby

ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #12] is

GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #10] is

DENIED; and it is further

1 ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. District of Columbia, (D.D.C. 2013).

James v. District of Columbia (James v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.