James v. Dickson

1 N.J.L. 257

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Wo < i;pnot make any intendment to over» turn a judgment^ it mu a arlv appear to us that there was error, and in order to do thin, the facts which constitute the ground of objection must be proved throughout. It may be that these parties have made two notes bearing the same date, and for the same sums, without seals and sued upon them. — > We ought rather to intend this in support of the judgment.— The judgments must be affirmed with costs.

Judgments affirmed,