James v. Davis

91 S.E. 280, 19 Ga. App. 246, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 77
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 1, 1917
Docket8195
StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E. 280 (James v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Davis, 91 S.E. 280, 19 Ga. App. 246, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 77 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Ltjke, J.

Upon tlie petition for certiorari and the answer of the ordinary, the court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., mid George, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 280, 19 Ga. App. 246, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-davis-gactapp-1917.