James v. Crownover

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

James v. Crownover

6 A. 42, 3 Sadler 73, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 785

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 4, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 6 A. 42 (James v. Crownover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Crownover, 6 A. 42, 3 Sadler 73, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 785 (Pa. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

There was no error in the refusal of the court to strike this judgment from the record. The note upon which it was entered contains an express confession of judgment. Not only did attorneys for the maker of the note appear and confess judgment against him, but the prothonotary also entered judgment on the note against him.

The record showed no such defect or error as to require the court to strike off the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

There was no error in the refusal of the court to strike this judgment from the record. The note upon which it was entered contains an express confession of judgment. Not only did attorneys for the maker of the note appear and confess judgment against him, but the prothonotary also entered judgment on the note against him.

The record showed no such defect or error as to require the court to strike off the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A. 42, 3 Sadler 73, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-crownover-pa-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack