James v. Cox
9 N.J.L. 335
This text of 9 N.J.L. 335 (James v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
James v. Cox, 9 N.J.L. 335 (N.J. 1827).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court, that a general deputation to an attorney was insufficient to enable him to authorize a person to serve process, and that he could not transfer his authority to another.
Service of the writ quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 N.J.L. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-cox-nj-1827.