James v. Cox
9 N.J.L. 335
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court, that a general deputation to an attorney was insufficient to enable him to authorize a person to serve process, and that he could not transfer his authority to another.
Service of the writ quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. Cox, 9 N.J.L. 335 (N.J. 1827).
9 N.J.L. 335 (James v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.