James v. Clement

Fifth Circuit

James v. Clement

211 F. 972, 128 C.C.A. 470, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1820

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 10, 1914

DocketNo. 2544

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 211 F. 972 (James v. Clement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Clement, 211 F. 972, 128 C.C.A. 470, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1820 (5th Cir. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The bill of exceptions in this case is composed in large part of a reference to the evidence contained in a bill of exceptions taken when the case was brought to this court On error from the first judgment.

A majority of the judges are of opinion'that this mode of procedure does not bring all the evidence properly before us. Being familiar with the evidence on the first trial, and having re-examined it for the purposes of the present hearing, we do not think our conclusion would be [973]*973changed if we considered the full bill of exceptions as now presented. There have now been two verdicts in favor of the validity of the transactions between the parties.

We are of opinion that no reversible error is shown by the record, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The bill of exceptions in this case is composed in large part of a reference to the evidence contained in a bill of exceptions taken when the case was brought to this court On error from the first judgment.

A majority of the judges are of opinion'that this mode of procedure does not bring all the evidence properly before us. Being familiar with the evidence on the first trial, and having re-examined it for the purposes of the present hearing, we do not think our conclusion would be [973]*973changed if we considered the full bill of exceptions as now presented. There have now been two verdicts in favor of the validity of the transactions between the parties.

We are of opinion that no reversible error is shown by the record, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 F. 972, 128 C.C.A. 470, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-clement-ca5-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack