James v. City of Greer
This text of 92 S.E. 1055 (James v. City of Greer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an action for injunction against condemnation proceedings. The defendant demurred to the complaint, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, in that the plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law, and in that the remedy by condemnation proceedings is exclusive. By consent of the parties to the action, the case was heard at Greenville instead of Spartanburg, where the action was commenced. His Plonor, the presiding Judge, ordered:
“That the demurrer be sustained, but that the question as to the pendency of an appeal from the award of the arbitrators to the Court of Common Pleas for Spartanburg county be, and the same is hereby, remitted to the Court of Common Pleas for that county for determination.”
*380 The defendant appealed from so much of the order as remitted the case for the purpose herein mentioned.
There is nothing in the record from which it can be construed that the action for injunction was in the nature of an appeal from the award of the arbitrators.
The appeal should therefore be sustained, and the order modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 1055, 107 S.C. 378, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-city-of-greer-sc-1917.