James v. Cities Service Oil Co.
43 N.E.2d 276, 140 Ohio St. 314, 140 Ohio St. (N.S.) 314, 23 Ohio Op. 571, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 447
Opinion
It appearing that the judges of this court a,re equally •divided in opinion as to the merits of this case, one of the judges not participating, and are unable for that reason to agree upon judgment, the entry of this fact •constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court •of Appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. Cities Service Oil Co., 43 N.E.2d 276, 140 Ohio St. 314, 140 Ohio St. (N.S.) 314, 23 Ohio Op. 571, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 447 (Ohio 1942).
43 N.E.2d 276 (James v. Cities Service Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. Corby
249 N.W.2d 567 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1977)
Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.
157 A.2d 129 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)