James v. Carolina Staffing Home Health

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedMarch 23, 2010
DocketI.C. NOS. 197131 PH-2272.
StatusPublished

This text of James v. Carolina Staffing Home Health (James v. Carolina Staffing Home Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Carolina Staffing Home Health, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2010).

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and argument of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good ground to receive further evidence or rehear the parties or their representatives. Following its review, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, with minor modifications.

***********
Based upon the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff is 37 years old. Plaintiff has a high school diploma and received a certificate from technical school. *Page 2

2. Plaintiff was hired by Defendant in April 2008 to work as a Rehabilitation Technician at a group home. Plaintiff's job duties included transporting patients, cleaning, and helping troubled patients set goals and progress toward these goals.

3. Plaintiff's direct supervisor was Israel Ojimadu, the owner of Defendant. Mr. Ojimadu was also the individual who paid Plaintiff. Defendant had more than three employees. Plaintiff testified that Defendant employed approximately 60 employees at the time of his injury.

4. On December 13, 2008, Plaintiff suffered an injury by accident during the course and scope of his employment with Defendant. Plaintiff was walking out of the back door of the house to take out the trash when he slipped on the porch steps and fell, injuring his head, spine, and right side. Plaintiff was able to stand after this fall. Subsequently, Plaintiff fell again when he climbed the stairs to care for another patient. Plaintiff lost consciousness after the second fall.

5. At the time of the injury, Plaintiff had an average weekly wage of $420.00, yielding a compensation rate of $280.00.

6. Plaintiff notified his supervisor, Israel Ojimadu, of the accident and was never told that Defendant had no workers' compensation insurance.

7. Defendant, according to Employment Security Commission records, failed to maintain workers' compensation insurance while subject to the Act for 261 days, including Plaintiff's date of injury.

8. Plaintiff initially treated at WakeMed Hospital Emergency Room on the day of the injury, where he underwent a chest x-ray, CT scan of head, CT scan of the back, and an x-ray of the lumbar spine. Plaintiff reported pain in his neck and lower back. Plaintiff was diagnosed with a hematoma on his head, a closed-head injury, a concussion, and a back contusion. He was instructed not to return to work until cleared by a physician upon follow-up. *Page 3

9. Plaintiff presented to the Duke Raleigh Hospital Emergency Department on January 19, 2009, with complaints of pain and spasm of the neck, headaches, and back pain. He was examined by Dr. Robert Kratz, who ordered several radiological studies. Plaintiff underwent a cervical spine CT scan that revealed spondylosis with multilevel degenerative disc disease, disc osteophyte complexes, and multilevel facet arthrosis. The central canal was narrowed by degenerative changes at the C3-4 level and at the C4-5 level. The reviewing radiologist recommended a cervical MRI for further evaluation. Dr. Kratz diagnosed neck and back pain with possible seizures and recommended an evaluation with an orthopedist and neurologist. Plaintiff was instructed not to drive until evaluated by a neurologist.

10. Dr. Cary Idler of Orthopaedic Specialists of North Carolina evaluated Plaintiff on January 30, 2009. Plaintiff reported that he was not working at that time due to his back pain. Dr. Idler also recommended a cervical MRI.

11. At the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, Plaintiff testified that he was still experiencing symptoms, including blurred vision, back pain, neck pain, numbness in his fingers, and pain running down his legs. He testified that he returned to work at Western Express on June 6, 2009, in order to support his family and not lose his home. At that time, Plaintiff had only worked four or five days for Western Express and had not received a paycheck. He expected that he would earn less there than he did prior to his injury, but was unsure how much because he was to be paid by the mile.

12. Plaintiff has not received any indemnity or medical compensation from Defendant.

13. Plaintiff had no health insurance at the time of his injury. Plaintiff continues to have unpaid medical bills. Plaintiff has been unable to afford the recommended MRI and *Page 4 neurological evaluation. At the time of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, Plaintiff's unpaid medical bills related to the December 13, 2008 injury totaled approximately $15,897.69.

14. The Full Commission finds that Plaintiff was unable to work due to his December 13, 2008 injuries from that date until his return to work on June 6, 2009. Thereafter, Plaintiff was able to work, though for lesser wages than he earned prior to his injury. Plaintiff required the above-described medical treatment for his work injuries and continues to be in need of treatment.

15. Defendant failed to appear at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner despite proper notice from the Industrial Commission. Defendant did not file a Brief with the Full Commission on appeal, but rather filed a Motion to Set Aside the Opinion and Award and a Motion for a New Hearing. Defendant contends that it retained an attorney who filed a Motion to Continue the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner. Defendant further contends that the attorney did not advise that the Motion to Continue was denied. Therefore, Defendant asserts that the failure to attend was justifiable and should be excused. Defendant requests a new hearing regarding the merits of the case and insurance coverage issues.

***********
Based upon the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission makes the following:

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The North Carolina Industrial Commission has jurisdiction of this matter. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2, et al.

2. Plaintiff suffered a compensable injury by accident to his head, back, and neck on December 13, 2008. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2(6).

3. On December 13, 2008, Defendant was a duly-qualified Employer and subject to *Page 5 the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act, having employed the requisite number of employees to be bound under the provisions of said Act at the time of the incident. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2.

4. As a result of Plaintiff's compensable injury by accident, Plaintiff was temporarily totally disabled until June 6, 2009, the date Plaintiff began working with Western Express. Plaintiff is entitled to temporary total disability compensation from December 13, 2008 through June 6, 2009. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-29.

5. On June 6, 2009, Plaintiff returned to work with an expectation that he would earn less than his pre-injury average weekly wage. As a result of Plaintiff's compensable injury by accident, Plaintiff is entitled to temporary partial disability compensation from June 6, 2009 to present and continuing, subject to the 300-week limitation, for any difference between his wages at his new job and his average weekly wage.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Egen v. Excalibur Resort Professional
663 S.E.2d 914 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
Engines & Equipment, Inc. v. Lipscomb
189 S.E.2d 498 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Couch v. Private Diagnostic Clinic
520 S.E.2d 785 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1999)
Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.
337 S.E.2d 477 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1985)
Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. Hall
349 S.E.2d 552 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)
Couch v. Private Diagnostic Clinic
515 S.E.2d 30 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Allen v. Food Lion, Inc.
450 S.E.2d 571 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James v. Carolina Staffing Home Health, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-carolina-staffing-home-health-ncworkcompcom-2010.